Transgressive Cinema / Course # L 225
Spring 2008
Dr. David Sterritt
Thursdays 9-11:45 a.m. / Brown 320
Office hours: by appointment, before and after class
djsterritt@aol.com
Course content:
Transgress:
To go beyond the bounds or limits … violate, infringe, contravene … To
break a law or command; to trespass, offend, sin. – Oxford English
Dictionary
This course explores a body of films that transgress
the norms of cinematic morality, decency, and taste, offering a
springboard for discussion of why certain movies are seen as violations
of the unwritten rules for “acceptable” cinematic discourse. By
viewing, discussing, and writing about works that challenge the
dominant paradigms of mass-media art and entertainment, students will
gain experience in film analysis, expand their understanding of
relevant ideas in film theory, and see some very wild movies. Parental
discretion advised!
Course schedule:
Unless otherwise specified, reading assignments are from Offensive Films by Mikita Brottman.
Part 1: Introduction to the cinema of transgression
January 24 –
Topic: Overview of the history and theory of transgressive film.
Screening: Funny Games, Michael Haneke (Austria, 1997)
Reading: “Introduction,” pp. 1-14
Part 2: Horror and transgression
January 31 –
Topic: The violated body in fiction and fact
Screening: Blood Feast, Herschell Gordon Lewis (USA, 1963)
The Act of Seeing with One’s Own Eyes, Stan Brakhage (USA 1971)
Reading: “Blood Feast: There Never Was a Party Like This!,” pp. 67-78
Assignment for January 31, due February 7
Herschell Gordon Lewis’s exploitation film Blood Feast and Stan Brakhage’s avant-garde film The Act of Seeing with One’s Own Eyes
both deal with the violated body, the first in fiction and the second
in fact. Which do you find to be a more disturbing or transgressive
film? Why?
Each
paper should be one page long, give or take a few lines, and typed.
Papers are due in the first class after the assignment is given.
Don’t forget to keep up with your course journal, 2-3 pages for each week’s work
February 7 –
Topic: Mad science
Screening: Shivers, David Cronenberg (Canada, 1975)
Assignment for February 5, due February 12
David Cronenberg’s horror film Shivers
deals simultaneously with the human race’s capacity for advanced
scientific understanding and its ability to regress into savage
violence when logical thought is bypassed or short-circuited. Does this
movie present serious ideas about the nature of human beings, or is it
designed merely to shock and scare the audience? State and briefly
explain your opinion.
February 14 –
Topic: Cinema as transgressive ritual
Screening: The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, Tobe Hooper (USA, 1974)
Reading: “Once Upon a Time in Texas,” pp. 96-112
Assignment for February 14, due February 21
The Texas Chain Saw Massacre contains a great deal of material,
including murder and cannibalism, that would be truly horrifying if we
encountered it in real life; yet the movie is regarded by many critics
and moviegoers as a horror classic. What accounts for the film’s
enduring popularity among horror-film audiences? Do you feel its high
reputation is deserved, or not? Briefly explain your views. Remember
that grading will take account of correct writing – spelling, grammar,
punctuation – as well as the ideas you express.
Don’t forget to keep up with your course journal, 2-3 pages for each week’s work
Part 3: Narratives of punishment and revenge
February 21 –
Topic: Woman as victim and victimizer
Screening: Day of the Woman, a.k.a. I Spit on Your Grave, Meir
Zarchi (USA, 1978)
Reading: Selected movie reviews (handout)
Roger Ebert's review
Scott Ashlin's review
February 28 –
Topic: Church and state, love and death, greed and the grotesque body
Screening: The Baby of Mâcon, Peter Greenaway (UK/France/
Germany/Belgium/Netherlands, 1993)
March 6 –
Topic: Carnivalizing the grotesque body
Screening: Freaks, Tod Browning (USA, 1932)
Reading: “Freaks: Carnivalizing the Taboo,” pp. 15-49
Assignment for February 28, due March 13
Choose either "Day of the Woman/I Spit on Your Grave" or "The Baby
of Mâcon" and discuss its treatment of the theme of revenge.
Be sure to
answer the question – some students are receiving grades lower than
necessary because they haven’t directly addressed the assignment.
March 13 –
Topic: Transgressing against time and space
Screening: Irréversible, Gaspar Noé (France, 2002)
Reading: “An Experiment in Time: Gaspar Noé’s Irréversible,” pp.
160-169
David Sterritt, “`Time Destroys All Things’: An Interview
with Gaspar Noé.” Quarterly Review of Film and Video
24:4 (2007), pp. 307-316.
March 27 –
Topic: On the road with sex and violence
Screening: Baise-moi, Virginie Despentes (France, 1972)
Part 4: Sex and sexuality
April 3 –
Topic: Kids
Screening: Ken Park, Larry Clark and Ed Lachman (USA/
Netherlands/France, 2002)
April 10 –
Topic: Obsession
Screening: In the Realm of the Senses, Nagisa Oshima (Japan/France,
1976)
Assignment for April 10, due April 17
Nagisa Oshima’s controversial 1976 drama In the Realm of the Senses has
been considered mere pornography by some critics, while others have
found it a complex examination of gender relations rooted in
longstanding traditions of Japanese culture. Which side are you on?
Briefly explain why.
Don’t forget to keep up with your course journal, 2-3 pages for each week’s work
April 17 –
Topic: Fascism, power, and the legacy of Sade
Screening: Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom, Pier Paolo Pasolini
(Italy/France, 1975)
April 24 –
Topic: Visiting the animal kingdom
Screening: Zoo, Robinson Devor (USA, 2007)
Part 5: Summing up and drawing conclusions
May 1 –
Topic: Thinking about violence
Screening: Natural Born Killers, Oliver Stone (USA, 1994)
Reading: “Afterword to the Second Edition,” pp. 170-179
Required book:
Mikita Brottman, Offensive Films (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2005)
All reading assignments on the syllabus are from these this book. Additional reading assignments will be given out in class.
Course requirements:
Students must attend all class sessions and screenings, complete all
reading assignments in a timely way, and participate actively in class
discussions.
In addition, each student must complete a
weekly paper and must keep a journal during the course, to be submitted
in class on April 29, the last day of the course. Guidelines for
journals are given below.
Final grades will not be
calculated according to a rigid formula, but will take account of all
work during the course – your weekly papers, your journal, and class
participation.
All written work must be typed.
Attendance and Participation:
Attendance will be taken at the beginning of each class. It is your
responsibility to get to class on time. Unexcused absences will result
in a lower final grade. If you know you will be absent on a future
date, let me know in advance. Absences will be excused only if you
provide verification (documentation of a legitimate reason: illness,
family emergency, etc.) as to why the class was missed. It is your
responsibility to catch up with work missed due to absences, excused or
otherwise. This includes all films that have been screened in class; if
you miss a film, you need to watch it in your own time. (Most films
will be available for viewing in the Media Resource Center after they
have been screened in class.) You should participate fully in class
discussions, since part of your final grade will reflect class
participation.
No late assignments will be accepted
unless the lateness has been excused, and this requires verification
(documentation of a legitimate reason: illness, family emergency, etc.)
as to why the due date was missed.
Journal rules and guidelines:
Every student must keep a course journal throughout the semester, to be
turned in at the final class. It must contain two to three pages on
each week’s subject matter, demonstrating knowledge of the pertinent
films and filmmakers, material covered in class discussions, and
material covered in the reading assignments. You are encouraged to view
additional relevant films outside class and include references to them
in your journal entries. This is not a diary – it is an academic
journal, meant to record what you are learning and thinking with regard
to the course on a weekly basis. You are welcome to include material
suggested by reading and film viewing outside class, but the material
must be relevant to this course.
Academic integrity:
Academic integrity -- the pursuit of scholarly activity free from fraud
and deception -- is an educational objective of this institution.
Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, cheating,
plagiarism, fabrication of information or citations, facilitating acts
of academic dishonesty by others, submitting work of another person or
submitting work previously used without informing the instructor, and
tampering with the academic work of other students.
A
student charged with academic dishonesty will be given oral or written
notice of the charge by the instructor. If students believe they have
been falsely accused, they should seek redress through informal
discussions with the instructor, department head, dean, or campus
executive officer. If the instructor believes the infraction is
sufficiently serious to warrant the referral of the case to the Office
of Conduct Standards, or if the instructor decides to give a final
grade of F in the course because of the infraction, the student and
faculty will be afforded formal due-process procedures.
Additional information
PLAGIARISM
Plagiarism
is using someone else’s words or ideas without acknowledgment.
Submitting work containing plagiarism is grounds for failure of an
assignment or failure of the course. Repeat offenses will be
brought to the attention of the department chair. To be
responsible when summarizing, paraphrasing, or quoting, include a
citation like:
*** I read in yesterday’s New York Times that…
*** As Simone de Beauvoir famously asserts: “One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman” (p. 34).
*** My roommate Pete noticed that…
***
If it’s common knowledge and your own idea, you do not need quotations.
The yellow of the Lance Armstrong bracelet suggests bravery.
Document
your citations in a bibliography or “works cited” page at the end of
your paper and follow standard guidelines such as MLA or Chicago manual
style. Familiarize yourself with these guidelines in Diana
Hacker’s A Pocket Style Manual, and always check with your instructor
before turning in questionable work. You may also check on these and
other language-related issues with one of the helpful tutors in the
Writing Center, (410) 225-2418. The Writing Center has copies of the
Hacker manual as well.
ADA COMPLIANCE: In MICA's efforts to
provide the highest possible quality educational experience for every
student, MICA maintains compliance with the requirements of the ADA and
Section 504. Any student who has, or suspects he or she may have,
a disability and wants to request academic accommodations must contact
the Director of the Learning Resource Center immediately.
The Director of the Learning Resource Center, Dr. Kathryn Smith, may be reached at 410 225-2416 or by email at ksmith@mica.edu.
MICA
has developed policies and practices to ensure a healthful environment
and safe approaches to the use of equipment, materials, and
processes. It is the mutual responsibility of faculty and
students to review health and safety standards relevant to each class
at the beginning of each semester. Students should be aware of
general fire, health, and safety regulations posted in each area and
course specific polices, practices, and cautions. Students who
have concerns related to health and safety should contact the
Environmental Health and Safety Coordinator.
The Environmental
Health and Safety Coordinator, Quentin Moseley, may be reached at 410
225-0220 or by email at qmosele@mica.edu.